Vanitas – 05
Amun: (Sorry, sorry, I know I’m not Armi). Vanitas this week was worth talking about – and how it’s faring as a vampire show overall. Vampires are a genre I’d love to see a resurgence after quite a few uneven showings in the last few years. The genre’s cornerstone – Hellsing – is unlikely to be replicated as the successors, like inferior offspring, fall into several traps: excessive brain-dead gore (Hellsing Ultimate), failed humour (Blood Lad), a confused zombie show (Shiki), or a monsters ensemble – which is not actually a vampire show at all (Kekkai Sensen, Monogatari series). Proper vampire shows are still around – Mars Red from last season was a decent attempt that tripped on its own feet halfway through. Vanitas so far has a great setup and a superlative twist – vampire and vampire hunter team up to defeat the threat…only it’s not a vampire hunter, it’s actually a vampire doctor. The bloodsuckers, so often the perpetrators, are the victims here – this isn’t human vs vampire, it’s a complicated world of humans helping/hurting vampires who are helping/hurting each other. That’s an excellent premise. How’s the execution? 5 episodes in, my verdict is: good! Noe is a surprisingly interesting viewer vehicle – he clearly has his own demons and is certainly marching to his own beat. Vanitas is what anti-heroes should be: not complete scum without a single redeeming quality, but a flawed person with good intentions and complicated motivations. The villain is sufficiently spooky and the supporting cast fleshes out well enough – I’m really quite pleased so far. I think this episode also had a great use of violence for a purpose instead of just for shock-value – you really feel Noe’s personal involvement with curse-bearers. Vampire shows are going to be a bit rough on the viewer, but that’s the nature of the genre, and I think so far – Vanitas has handled it excellently.



































